Friday, February 6, 2026

Diarist Review: 'Les Misérables' - The World Tour Spectacular in Manila

Formative musical is back in concert form in Manila, as part of GMG's season--the website version of this review in The Diarist here. Hard to believe it's been two decades since I listened to In My Life over and over again that one summer. 

*     *     *     *     *

Les Misérables has given us back Red Concepcionthank you

Gala night curtain call, featuring Geronimo Rauch (left), Jeremy Secomb (right), and the four Pinoys (from 2nd left to 2nd right): Rachelle Ann Go, Lea Salonga, Red Concepcion, and Emily Bautista.


Of the many reasons to be thankful that Les Misérables has returned to The Theatre at Solaire, the most meaningful one must be this: It has given us back Red Concepcion—and introduced his talents to an infinitely larger theater-going public.


For close to a decade now, Concepcion has performed mainly abroad: as The Engineer in the UK and US national tours of Miss Saigon, as one of the loinclothed wrestlers of Sumo at the Public Theater in New York, and—most notably—as the hapless Amos Hart in the long-running production of Chicago on Broadway.


Ardent followers of the Manila theater scene, however, would know him as the quintessential working actor, appearing with equal ease in both musicals and straight plays before embarking on his international career. In 2015, he was part of two vastly different, first-rate ensembles—The Necessary Theatre’s The Normal Heart at RCBC Plaza, and the superhero musical Kung Paano Ako Naging Leading Lady at PETA Theater Center—on top of winning a Gawad Buhay for his starring turn in Priscilla, Queen of the Desert at Newport World Resorts the previous year.


Les Misérables at Solaire is nothing short of the warmest and most triumphant homecoming for Concepcion.


Back after 10 years


Ten years after its Philippine premiere, Cameron Mackintosh’s blockbuster adaptation of the Victor Hugo novel is back in Manila in a concert-style staging that has been touring the world since 2024.

   

In this production, Concepcion tackles the secondary part of the innkeeper Thénardier. It’s a role whose one big song, Master of the House, is arguably eclipsed by the big songs of the other principal characters: nowhere near as popular as Eponine’s On My Own, Fantine’s I Dreamed a Dream, Jean Valjean’s Bring Him Home, Javert’s Stars, even Marius’ Empty Chairs at Empty Tables. Thénardier is pretty much the definition of a side character, existing solely as fuel to the musical’s overlapping narratives.


Yet, Concepcion has miraculously turned this innkeeper into the biggest star of Les Mis. Put simply, he is perfect in the role—and the best thing about this show: a comic genius who is always able to find the right texture and scale for his performance. Watching him throughout his 25 or so minutes onstage, one easily grasps the entire spectrum of sleaze and depravity that the pathetic man he’s portraying is capable of. And he completely sells the dark humor in that depravity—especially during Master of the House, which becomes a true-blue tavern sing-along in his hands. By the end of that song—the first of this production’s two standout numbers—the theater feels absolutely alive, the energy palpably electric.


For the generation of theater-goers who “came of age” during the COVID lockdowns, this is the first time they’re watching Concepcion on the Manila stage. And what they’re seeing is far and away the clearest and most focused presence in that show: It’s impossible to look away when he’s performing, and when he’s not, you end up looking for him. In fact, it’s because of Concepcion that one altogether forgets this is actually a concert production of Les Mis.


More than a concert


That last bit is crucial to appraising this production. Tracing its roots to the 2019 All-Star Staged Concert in London’s West End—itself the obvious progeny of the historic 10th anniversary Dream Cast in Concert and the subsequent 25th anniversary concert productions—this current Les Mis nevertheless constantly gestures towards being the fully staged thing; it clearly wants to be more than just a concert. There is all manner of outstanding staging and design infused into this production to support that idea.


The flaw, if one may nitpick, is in the hodgepodge of performance styles of the cast. Rachelle Ann Go is a very melodramatic, Star Cinema romantic lead as Fantine; Emily Bautista is a nonchalant Eponine; Lea Salonga is all shades of broad and busy as Madame Thenardier, with a Cockney accent to boot. And so on.


Individually, the actors generally do justice to the score; with a few exceptions, the singing in this nearly three-hour show is heaven-sent. Taken together, however, it’s like everyone’s performing in their own versions and registers of Les Mis.


This production also brings into focus the fact that the Les Mis of today is no longer the Les Mis of 30 years ago. Specifically, it’s evident that, in certain parts, the musical has been sped-up—supposedly to keep it running under three hours. The changes in musical direction are quite apparent in songs like In My Life, which now denies the listener the chance to fully bask in the sweep of its lush, romantic melody. On gala night, Lulu-Mae Pears as Cosette could barely keep up with the tempo of that big song of hers; elsewhere—and to a far lesser extent—so, too, could Geronimo Rauch as Valjean and Will Callan as Marius.

 

So it’s left to Concepcion and Jeremy Secomb’s Javert to sell the fantasy of this show being more than just a concert. As it happens, the two are giving the most unadorned performances here—and, in effect, the most effective.


Secomb is literally a cold, impermeable wall throughout the show—you fully understand how this man could spend decades hyperfixating over the parole-breaking ex-con Valjean. That is, until late in Act II, during Javert’s Suicide, which is unexpectedly the other musical highlight of this production. In Secomb’s hands, the song becomes a masterclass in depicting madness and the vicious collapse of the human psyche. By then, Javert has had his principles put to an unanticipated test, the world as he knows it turned upside down by Valjean’s earlier, simple gesture of forgiveness (the latter had spared the former’s life while in captivity during an insurrection).


Secomb’s rendition is the one instance that genuinely complicates the material and—over two hours into this musical—dares to upend the whole of Les Mis, with its ethos of goodness and righteous selfhood, and its allegiance to a particular moral compass.


All things considered, though, this production more or less earns its subtitle: This sold-out run can be quite the spectacular thing.


All about the songs


The staging only highlights how Les Mis works best as a concert: It’s all about the songs, and the big emotions and dramatic moments that come with them. Ensemble numbers like One Day MoreAt the End of the Day, even Valjean’s Death at the end, are a thrill to behold and listen to. The narrative fluff, more obvious in the fully staged versions, are here very easy to overlook.

 

More importantly, Manila audiences should be thankful that this Les Mis has chosen to return to Solaire, out of all the possible venues in the capital region, and that GMG Productions has recently renewed its partnership with that theater.


When this production started in Europe in 2024, it was subtitled The Arena Spectacular World Tour and, true to its name, was playing mainly stadiums and arenas like a Lady Gaga concert (for example, the AO Arena in Manchester, with a maximum capacity of 21,000; the Royal Arena in Copenhagen, maximum capacity: 16,000; the Spektrum in Oslo, maximum capacity: nearly 10,000).

 

Relative to those other houses, Solaire is diminutive. But it also has the best theater technology in Manila, including the best sound. And in Les Mis, now subtitled the World Tour Spectacular, those assets are magnified a thousand-fold, the production itself taking advantage of them to live up to its full title. Watching this Les Mis is like coming face to face with a wall of sound, in the best possible way. It’s the musical at literally its crispest and clearest, in terms of the singing and, more so, the orchestrations. You can only envy those who are hearing this gorgeous score for the first time through this production.


Best use of lights in Manila


This Les Mis also has the best use of lights Manila theater has seen of late. It’s not only that the lighting design is deathly precise and consistently attuned to the emotional currents of each scene: It also couldn’t be more inventive. Here, the lighting makes the space, expanding and shrinking the performance environment as necessary, and doing a lot of heavy lifting to summon the setting for each number. The lighting rigs are deployed in ways that help create physical spaces—one moment, the ceiling of a house; the next, an elevated walkway constructing the illusion of balconies or terraces.


And in lieu of sets, this production continues the 21st-century tradition of flashing painterly backdrops to signify location. Now, there are three giant screens projecting those backdrops, and deployed judiciously for close-ups of the singers’ faces during specific moments.


That’s Les Mis 2026 in a nutshell: topnotch production values, sensational singing all around, two unmissable performances, and one homegrown actor who deserves to be seen by more Filipino theater-goers. And it’s only February.

Tuesday, January 20, 2026

Diarist Feature: Manila Society of Theater Reviewers, 1st MSTR Awards, and the need for theater criticism

Wrote a little postscript to this thing we've launched--the website version in The Diarist here

*     *     *     *     * 

Why we formed the theater reviewers' group

Last January 10, the newly formed Manila Society of Theater Reviewers (MSTR) handed out its inaugural awards celebrating the theatrical works that opened in Metro Manila in 2025. It was a great day for Areté, the thriving arts hub of Ateneo de Manila University: Four productions that it (co-)produced collectively won seven of the 10 categories up for grabs, in addition to a handful of honorable mentions. 


Best Production of a Play, Best New Filipino Work, and Best Achievement in Design went to Quomodo Desolata Es? Isang Dalamhati, the new translation (by Jerry Respeto) and adaptation (by Guelan Luarca) of the seminal Nick Joaquin play A Portrait of the Artist as Filipino. Those who missed this production’s two-weekend run in August 2025 still have a chance to catch it when it returns to Ateneo’s Hyundai Hall beginning January 30, 2026.


Best director


Luarca was named Best Director both for his work on Quomodo and 3 Upuan (an Areté co-production with Scene Change), which also took home Best Lead Performance in a Play for Jojit Lorenzo.


Meanwhile, Nelsito Gomez and Wolfgang lead vocalist Basti Artadi’s Si Faust—a rock opera based on the Faustian legend, as dramatized by the German playwright Johann Wolfgang von Goethe—bagged Best Production of a Musical, as well as Best Lead Performance in a Musical for Maita Ponce’s electrifying take on the devil Mephistopheles. 


The three other categories won by shows not produced by Areté were Best Featured Performance in a Play (Benedix Ramos for Dagitab, Luarca’s adaptation of the titular 2014 Cinemalaya film by Giancarlo Abrahan, now produced by Scene Change); Best Featured Performance in a Musical (Marvin Ong for The Sandbox Collective’s Side Show); and the Emerging Talent Award (Ramos again, for his impressive body of work last year, which also included his turns in Barefoot Theatre Collaborative’s Bar Boys: The Musical and Sandbox’s Next to Normal). Further attesting to Ateneo’s status as the place to be for theater in the capital region’s north these days, Bar Boys also ran at Areté’s Hyundai Hall—a hugely successful engagement from October to November—while Dagitab originated at the university’s Fine Arts Black Box in July. 


At this point, I should disclose that I’m not only a voting member of MSTR, but also its cofounder and convener. So, with absolutely no hint of bias whatsoever, I’ll say that anyone who painstakingly followed the theatrical landscape last year would probably agree that this was a pretty strong set of honorees: works that pushed the boundaries of local theater, championed original Filipino playwriting and music-making, and put on stark display the expansive and distinctly Pinoy emotive and dramatic capacities of our terrific artists.


The impetus to do the hard work of actually forming MSTR came from our founder Nikki Francisco, editor-in-chief and lead reviewer of TheaterFansManila.com (TFM), back in the first quarter of last year. (Vlad Bunoan of ABS-CBN News Online had voiced a similar idea to me separately.)


And really, what spurred each of us to think about collectivizing, in a manner of speaking, was the fact that there was: 1) no existing guild or association for reviewers covering the Manila theater scene, despite the thriving landscape, and 2) no dedicated awards for theater handed out by the reviewers themselves. That “Manila theater is alive!” is a proclamation I’ve been hearing for over a good decade already. In the early 2010s, it truly felt like a new era for the industry: A new generation of artists came of age, more new companies were being established, and new, frequently innovative work was sprouting everywhere. The few of us who were writing regularly back then did what we could to document these developments and trends, spending our weekends and even weekday nights hopping from venue to venue—but in the end, any assessment of the year as a whole was done on an individual basis.


In terms of organized award-giving bodies whose outcomes (or processes) don’t lead to more questions than satisfied silences, Manila has the Gawad Buhay—now on its 16th year and handed out by the Philippine Legitimate Stage Artists Group or PHILSTAGE—as well as the relatively newer LEAF (or Live Entertainment, Arts, and Festivals) Awards. (Disclosure: I have been part of the jury for the former since 2015.)


The gap that MSTR is filling


So perhaps the simple American or British analogy can be most helpful in illustrating the gap that MSTR is filling. In New York and London, you have the Tonys and Oliviers—both industry awards, whose voting bases include a significant proportion composed of members of the industry or theater professionals themselves. (Members of media are also among the voters, but they are a stark minority.) Then you have the awards handed out by theater critics, reviewers, journalists, and/or publishers: the Drama Desks, Outer Critics Circle, and New York Drama Critics Circle for New York; the Critics Circle Theatre Awards for London. There are other awards, such as the Lucille Lortel for Off-Broadway, or the Evening Standard Theatre Awards given out by the English newspaper The Standard, but the above examples should suffice for analogy.


MSTR is intended to be the journalists’ or reviewers’ or critics’ awards—depending on the possessive noun one is comfortable using—which has hitherto been missing in the Manila theater industry.


We started this endeavor without any pretense to so-called exhaustive assessment, or that we could watch every show that opens in Manila and subsequently hand out a “be-all and end-all” awards. None of us nine members during the organization’s first year were—or are—full-time theater reviewers (to my knowledge, no such person exists in the Philippines). So the internal directive was simple: to watch as much as we could and write as much as we could. The eligibility criteria we agreed upon accounted for these limitations: At least three members should have seen a particular production for it to be deemed eligible for the awards, and that production should have played at least four performances. In the end, we still managed to arrive at a roster of 66 eligible productions.


As for the awards categories—there are only 10—the idea is one of celebration, rather than competition, and we looked to the UK’s Critics Circle Theatre Awards in particular for inspiration. Hence, the absence of “nominees”; we went straight to voting for and announcing the winners and the honorable mentions, as a way of commemorating the best of the best. 


Our production categories don’t distinguish between Filipino and non-Filipino material, nor between professional and university companies. (Gawad Buhay, in contrast, considers only new productions from its 16 professional member companies.) This rule is not meant to disadvantage smaller-scale and non-professional productions, contrary to what some Redditors would have you think, but rather, embodies our belief in the capacity of these small, non-professional productions and organizations to be just as good—if not better—than the pros. (In 2019, for example, my choices for best musical for my yearend roundup for the Philippine Daily Inquirer were Ateneo Blue Repertory’s Spring Awakening and the thesis musical Hanggang Isang Araw at the University of the Philippines Diliman, and for best Filipino play, Alpha Kappa Omega by Tanghalang Ateneo.)


Flagship award


We also established the category Best New Filipino Work as a kind of flagship award—mainly to encourage Filipino playwrights, composers, and librettists to make more new and original work. And the Emerging Talent Award, as the name implies, is intended to reward breakthrough talent and work, including from individuals not normally associated with the fields they’re being recognized for. This year’s honorable mentions, for instance, included Sarah Facuri—an established actress, yes, but in Si Faust, apparently also a highly imaginative set designer (Facuri previously designed the set for Company of Actors in Streamlined Theatre’s Uncle Jane in 2023, but Si Faust was inarguably her breakout moment).


For Outstanding Contribution to Theater, we decided to posthumously honor two artists who passed away suddenly in 2025, each of them still with shows that were only about to (re-)open: GA Fallarme, who had basically become synonymous with the field of projection design, and George de Jesus III, one of those rare playwrights who seemed to have no problem juggling and balancing different moods and genres—and oftentimes within the same work (see ManiacalWanted: Male BoardersSala sa Pito).


In hindsight, voting on the awards was the easiest part of the journey of building MSTR. We—that is to say, Nikki Francisco, Esquire Magazine’s Christa De La Cruz, and I, plus TFM’s Frida Tan as our biggest cheerleader—have also had to put up a functional website from scratch; create logos and visuals for the organization, and graphics for the awards (thank you, Canva!); and become sort of overnight social media managers to kickstart and sustain MSTR’s presence on Facebook and Instagram, among other labor-intensive, behind-the-scenes tasks. To be clear, none of us are Gen Z, designers by trade, or self-professed techies.


In his 2025 yearend roundup, MSTR member Gibbs Cadiz—arguably the one voice Manila theater always looks forward to hearing from every end of the year—celebrated the fact that “there are enough of our species now… to form a guild.” Only by ensuring that local theater “is chronicled properly, both honored and scrutinized through sustained documentation and lively discourse,” Cadiz wrote, can we collectively “insist that, in the larger scheme of things, theater is a civic act, and that it matters.” 


Indeed, MSTR is meant to be more than just an award-giving body. As the “About Us” section of our website states, the group aims not just to honor the best theatrical works of the year through its annual awards, but, more importantly, to promote and support the capital region’s theater industry by providing “consistent, publicly accessible theater criticism”—and thus “elevate discourse on theater among industry practitioners, journalists, academics, and the general theatergoing public.” In short, to foster more meaningful, insightful, and in-depth conversation on theater through the medium of the written word. 


To Cadiz’s assessment, I’d add that this insistence on writing constantly about the theater—regardless of whether it’s a rave or a pan—is also a healthy way of preventing the proliferation of yes men and sycophants. Far too often, I’ve heard fellow theater journalists, especially younger and newer ones, say they’d rather not write about a show than write a negative review of it. There might be an economic argument to that, of course—maybe a bad review will shoo prospective ticket buyers away in an already-precarious economy—but nobody, least of all paying audiences, deserves to see a bad show. A review that doesn’t shy away from speaking the truth is the least—and also the most vital—thing theater journalists and critics can contribute to helping the scene grow, and historicizing its peaks and not-so-fine moments.


Unsurprisingly, there are theater practitioners who would disagree with the arguments above, and would rather ban or blacklist reviewers from their shows than make space for fair and level-headed discussion. Yet, it’s impossible to overlook how the civic act of theater is one that can be kept alive only through both inventive, intelligent artistry—and inventive, intelligent criticism. It’s not baseless to say that theater makers and theater reviewers all want the same thing (at least, I know I do): an honest-to-goodness good show. 


Let me end by appropriating the words of film critic David Ehrlich, from his introductory remarks at this year’s New York Film Critics Circle awards dinner: “It’s not what critics and artists want from each other, but what we give to each other that matters. Yes, we give you awards in return for you giving us things to write about, but really, what we give to each other are reasons to continue giving a shit about the things we love, and the courage to insist that the things we love are still capable of giving us something meaningful in return.” What’s an honest review—or any expression of honesty, really—if not the purest expression of love?

Thursday, January 1, 2026

The Year in Film & TV (2025)

Like I said at the start of the year: I'm done being an awards season completist. Only 128 entries in my Letterboxd, plus a lot of TV, though still a far cry from my 2020/2021/2022 numbers (I believe there's no returning to those days anymore). The upside is that I ended up seeing 77 pieces of theater, so best to take that earlier declaration with a grain of salt. Now let me leave you with just a top three--as usual, culled from the year's titles and the previous year's leftovers: a trifecta that forms a prescient, frightening, hope-diminishing picture of the world we now live in.


1. 'The Rehearsal' Season 2 (HBO; created by Nathan Fielder)

The best thing I saw this year, a complete overhaul of the phrase "committing to the bit." Fattest brain in the entire universe, in the most Filipino sense. And a richer, far more insightful and expansive look into this pocket of the manosphere, the patriarchy, and the emotional circuits of these effing males, than that British miniseries with the one-take schtick.

2. 'No Other Land' (dirs. Basel Adra, Hamdan Ballal, Yuval Abraham & Rachel Szor)

The defining global event of our time; the unmasking of the so-called modern benevolent White Westerner; the ultimate test of our individual and collective moral compasses--all simultaneously complicated and rendered crystal-clear in one of the bravest pieces of filmmaking ever made.

3. 'One Battle After Another' (dir. Paul Thomas Anderson)

I know, I know, it's a very US film/problem, but it may as well be about us.

*     *     *     *     *

Here are the rest of my 5-star titles in alphabetical order, and hyperlinked to my Letterboxd review where applicable:

*     *     *     *     *

Links to my past lists, which are best read as time capsules documenting what I'd seen and where I was at the time I wrote them:

The Year in Film and TV 202420232022202120202019
The Decade in Film 2010-19
The Year in Film 20182017201620152014